Impact of Nerve Preservation During Parametrectomy on Urinary Retention in Deep Endometriosis Surgery


 Impact of Nerve Preservation During Parametrectomy on Urinary Retention in Deep Endometriosis Surgery

Poor parametrial nerve preservation increases the risk of post-surgical urinary retention, even with excellent contralateral preservation.

Key Points

Importance:

  • Understanding the relationship between nerve preservation and urinary retention can guide surgical strategies to minimize complications.
  • Optimizing nerve-sparing techniquesfor deep infiltrating endometriosis may improve post-operative recovery and patient quality of life.
  • The importance of meticulous nerve-sparing techniques to prevent complications is emphasized.

Highlights:

  • Nerve preservation during parametrectomy significantly impacts post-surgical urinary function in deep endometriosis patients.
  • Poor nerve preservation is associated with a higher risk of urinary retention and prolonged catheterization.

What's done here:

  • A team of Brazilian urologists evaluated different levels of nerve preservation during parametrectomy for deep endometriosis.
  • The study included 151 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for deep endometriosis between 2021-2023.
  • A multidisciplinary team of urologists, pathologists, gynecologists, and proctologists conducted this retrospective study.
  • Nerve preservation of the inferior hypogastric plexus was classified as excellent, regular, or poor for both the left and right parametrium.
  • Postoperative urinary retention was assessed using an indwelling bladder catheter from day one. Patients unable to void or with post-void residual urine >100 mL were re-catheterized.

Key results:

  • Excellent nerve preservation was achieved in 72.8% of cases, regular in 15.8%, and poor in 11.2%.
  • The need for post-operative catheterization was highest in the poor nerve preservation group.
  • The risk of requiring intermittent self-catheterization was 23.1% up to 8 weeks and 7.7% up to 8 months post-surgery.
  • Even with excellent contralateral preservation, poor nerve preservation on one side increased the risk of urinary dysfunction.

Lay Summary

Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is the most advanced form of the disease, characterized by lesions penetrating deeper than 5 mm. Surgical treatment requires a meticulous approach to minimize functional complications. Deep lesions involving the parametrium, uterosacral ligaments, and anterior rectal wall may affect the inferior hypogastric nerve fibers, leading to a high incidence of postoperative voiding dysfunction. These fibers are anatomically located medially to the internal iliac arteries and caudally where the uterine artery crosses the ureter. Thus, preserving the nerves responsible for bladder function is a key surgical objective.

Gasparoni Jr. et al., from the Department of Urology at the Federal Hospital of Lagoa, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, evaluated patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic parametrectomy for DIE between 2021 and 2023. They classified parametrial nerve preservation as excellent, regular, or poor, independent of laterality, to assess its impact on voiding function.

Nerve preservation was excellent in 72.8% of cases, regular in 15.8%, and poor in 11.2%. Postoperative urinary retention requiring re-catheterization occurred predominantly in the poor preservation group.

The authors concluded that meticulous nerve-sparing techniques are essential in DIE surgery to minimize the risk of voiding dysfunction. They emphasized that "Parametrectomy with poor-nerve preservation can lead to urinary retention, even with excellent contralateral preservation." This study was recently published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.


Research Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39609310/


parametrectomy unilateral nerve sparing cytoreductive surgery laparoscopy robotic surgery hypogastric plexus intermittent urethral catheterization urinary retention endometriosis.

DISCLAIMER

EndoNews highlights the latest peer-reviewed scientific research and medical literature that focuses on endometriosis. We are unbiased in our summaries of recently-published endometriosis research. EndoNews does not provide medical advice or opinions on the best form of treatment. We highly stress the importance of not using EndoNews as a substitute for seeking an experienced physician.